<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: nature photography &#8211; questions anyone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://magickcanoe.com/blog/index.php/2007/03/20/nature-photography-questions-anyone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://magickcanoe.com/blog/2007/03/20/nature-photography-questions-anyone/</link>
	<description>a place where nature, photography and writing meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:48:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: burning silo</title>
		<link>http://magickcanoe.com/blog/2007/03/20/nature-photography-questions-anyone/comment-page-1/#comment-39036</link>
		<dc:creator>burning silo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magickcanoe.com/blog/2007/03/20/nature-photography-questions-anyone/#comment-39036</guid>
		<description>Peter - Thanks for adding some addition notes about the cameras.  It&#039;s good to get feedback on things like how large or heavy a camera feels, etc...
-
am - Thanks!  It&#039;s occasionally mentioned to me that my insect photos are unusual for the way in which I portray them -- a suppose a little more sympathetically than is typical.  I find many insect photos kind of static, so I&#039;m always trying to move in the direction of capturing whatever it is that gives life to the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter &#8211; Thanks for adding some addition notes about the cameras.  It&#8217;s good to get feedback on things like how large or heavy a camera feels, etc&#8230;<br />
-<br />
am &#8211; Thanks!  It&#8217;s occasionally mentioned to me that my insect photos are unusual for the way in which I portray them &#8212; a suppose a little more sympathetically than is typical.  I find many insect photos kind of static, so I&#8217;m always trying to move in the direction of capturing whatever it is that gives life to the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: am</title>
		<link>http://magickcanoe.com/blog/2007/03/20/nature-photography-questions-anyone/comment-page-1/#comment-38946</link>
		<dc:creator>am</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magickcanoe.com/blog/2007/03/20/nature-photography-questions-anyone/#comment-38946</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t usually think of spiders and snakes and insects as being photogenic. Your photos are remarkable, Bev! Thanks for stretching my mind in a good way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t usually think of spiders and snakes and insects as being photogenic. Your photos are remarkable, Bev! Thanks for stretching my mind in a good way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://magickcanoe.com/blog/2007/03/20/nature-photography-questions-anyone/comment-page-1/#comment-38899</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 18:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magickcanoe.com/blog/2007/03/20/nature-photography-questions-anyone/#comment-38899</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment on the lobster face Bev, the total views shot right up after you posted a link :-)

Celeste -  I had the chance to play with a D40 on the weekend.  Great camera! I have used the D80 as well (earlier today actualy), and I don&#039;t think I could stand lugging that one around in the field even with just one lens.  The D40 is a much lighter camera, much better suited for being out and about, unless you want to build some large shoulder muscles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment on the lobster face Bev, the total views shot right up after you posted a link :-)</p>
<p>Celeste &#8211;  I had the chance to play with a D40 on the weekend.  Great camera! I have used the D80 as well (earlier today actualy), and I don&#8217;t think I could stand lugging that one around in the field even with just one lens.  The D40 is a much lighter camera, much better suited for being out and about, unless you want to build some large shoulder muscles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burning silo</title>
		<link>http://magickcanoe.com/blog/2007/03/20/nature-photography-questions-anyone/comment-page-1/#comment-38838</link>
		<dc:creator>burning silo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://magickcanoe.com/blog/2007/03/20/nature-photography-questions-anyone/#comment-38838</guid>
		<description>Peter &amp; Xris - Thanks for additional input on the cameras.  I&#039;ve posted some comments in response up in the main body of the above post.
-
Cathy - Thanks!  Well, don&#039;t let me deter you from checking out DSLRs, but I do know that, at the moment, they aren&#039;t really for me.  I&#039;m very happy with the CP8800 and it&#039;s about as large a camera as I&#039;m willing to carry around.  I&#039;m quite hard on my equipment -- both the CP4500 and the CP8800 have taken at least a couple of major falls while I&#039;ve been out hiking.  The bodies of both of them are titanium, which is probably why they didn&#039;t get shattered before now.  Anyhow, I think it&#039;s good to look at all options and not feel too restricted. There are so many nice cameras around now - in all sizes and price ranges - that there&#039;s likely something out there to suit just about every need.  
-
John - I was wondering if you had been checking out cameras yet.  As mentioned to Cathy, there are so many nice cameras around now that I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll find one that suits. 
-
Celeste - Thanks!  It&#039;s too bad we&#039;re all so far apart as it would have been fun to have all of us together in a group to talk about nature photography.  I think all of the Nikon and Canon DSLR bodies are fine cameras and take great photos.  There&#039;s certainly nothing wrong with cropping down images of small things from larger images... that is regularly done, especially when people are using a telephoto lens to shoot very small subjects.  With the CP4500, I rarely have to crop much, but with the CP8800, depending on the shot, I usually do at least a little cropping as it captures a lot of &quot;extra&quot; with that big lens.  I love black and white too and use it for some things -- usually more for art photography that I do and not so much for the nature shoting.  I think that&#039;s a nice idea for a field guide...one that is a little more aesthetic than technical.  I&#039;ve been thinking of doing something kind of similar -- well, it would actually be a bit offbeat -- with my nature photos.  I think there&#039;s plenty if territory for &quot;other&quot; uses of nature photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter &#038; Xris &#8211; Thanks for additional input on the cameras.  I&#8217;ve posted some comments in response up in the main body of the above post.<br />
-<br />
Cathy &#8211; Thanks!  Well, don&#8217;t let me deter you from checking out DSLRs, but I do know that, at the moment, they aren&#8217;t really for me.  I&#8217;m very happy with the CP8800 and it&#8217;s about as large a camera as I&#8217;m willing to carry around.  I&#8217;m quite hard on my equipment &#8212; both the CP4500 and the CP8800 have taken at least a couple of major falls while I&#8217;ve been out hiking.  The bodies of both of them are titanium, which is probably why they didn&#8217;t get shattered before now.  Anyhow, I think it&#8217;s good to look at all options and not feel too restricted. There are so many nice cameras around now &#8211; in all sizes and price ranges &#8211; that there&#8217;s likely something out there to suit just about every need.<br />
-<br />
John &#8211; I was wondering if you had been checking out cameras yet.  As mentioned to Cathy, there are so many nice cameras around now that I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll find one that suits.<br />
-<br />
Celeste &#8211; Thanks!  It&#8217;s too bad we&#8217;re all so far apart as it would have been fun to have all of us together in a group to talk about nature photography.  I think all of the Nikon and Canon DSLR bodies are fine cameras and take great photos.  There&#8217;s certainly nothing wrong with cropping down images of small things from larger images&#8230; that is regularly done, especially when people are using a telephoto lens to shoot very small subjects.  With the CP4500, I rarely have to crop much, but with the CP8800, depending on the shot, I usually do at least a little cropping as it captures a lot of &#8220;extra&#8221; with that big lens.  I love black and white too and use it for some things &#8212; usually more for art photography that I do and not so much for the nature shoting.  I think that&#8217;s a nice idea for a field guide&#8230;one that is a little more aesthetic than technical.  I&#8217;ve been thinking of doing something kind of similar &#8212; well, it would actually be a bit offbeat &#8212; with my nature photos.  I think there&#8217;s plenty if territory for &#8220;other&#8221; uses of nature photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.573 seconds -->
